The legal standard of law to "Jury Demand" for a "trial by jury" in a court.
Insurance company fraud, bad faith with malice, and fraud on the court have illegally attempted to "terminate" your meaningful U.S. Flag in a courtroom of law which represents The Constitution of the United States and statutes in a court of law.
The United States Flag represents "due process of law" to a "Jury Demand" action for a substantial "Trial by Jury in Civil Cases" action in our State(s) and Federal courtrooms.
We are now pursuing 22+ years of ongoing insurance company bad faith and fraud matters, with18+ years of "fraud on the court" case matters against the Americans citizens and their United States Flag, and the loss of 225+ years of American Constitutional history.
See: http://badfaith.info ~ A true story of 20+ years of insurance company fraud, insurance company theft of wellbeing, and next insurance company representatives allegedly perpetrated fraud on the court, that is also against you and all American citizens so as o "terminate" the jury trial process against fair justice.
This is a national emergency and serious violation of crimes against you the reader, and against your U.S. Flag represented in your American courtrooms of law.
Insurance company fraud and fraud on your American Courts
The insurance company Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (aka Assurant Inc.) had denied Long Term Disability (LTD) insurance policy benefits to the insured party for nearly two years (monetary benefits)(1996-1998), and still to this date have failed to deliver all past due remaining benefits (Now 22+ years past). Specifically the benefit to sue
The only option the insured party could do to recover due benefits was to sue the insurance company in a court of law for breach of contract and bad faith with malice against the insured party. And they did sue, with an expressed "jury demand" for a "trial by jury in civil cases" on these matters of "insurance company fraud".
The legal standard of law to perform a "jury demand" for a "trial by jury" in the state of Ohio is dictated by way of the Constitution the State of Ohio; Bill of Rights Section 5. (Most other State(s) express a similar rule of law action.)
In addition, the legal standard of law in the United States of America also dictates a "trial by jury" action enforced by way of the Constitution of the United States; Bill of Rights; First Amendment (Petition), Fifth Amendment (Rights), Seventh Amendment (Jury in Civil Cases), Ninth Amendment (Other Rights), Tenth Amendment (State Powers), and Fourteenth Amendment (Rights of Citizens).
Both of these laws (independent or together) are a valuable legal "right of action" and measure of legal protection to all American Citizen in a court of law. Any interference from a "trial by jury" civil action is gross infraction of Constitutional laws, and is clearly a “perversion of justice”, and possibly a criminal act for a Grand Jury to decide for a "True Bill".
However to this date, we have not had our day in court with a jury of our peers. Why does it take over 20+ years to get a "trial by jury" action in our American courts of law, and further find remedies of relief with a "verdict" to alleged matters of "insurance company fraud"?
Sensational Story of "Insurance Company Fraud" against
The Constitution of the United States, The Constitution of the State of Ohio,
and You as American taxpayer and citizen of the United States.
Below are the historical “Case Docket Numbers” of the legal actions associated with 20+ years of alleged “insurance company fraud”, and “fraud on the court”.
Alleged “breach of contract”, "breach of duty" and further bad faith with malice against the "insured" party,.
Furthermore, alleged acts to a willful conspiracy to "forged; fabricated and perpetrate “false statements" and "false claims" of the term "Employee Retirement Income Security Act", "ERISA"(1974), against the legal parties involved herein, against the Officers of the Courts, and against the state and federal American Courts of the judicial taxpayers and citizens of the Unite States.
The Plaintiff (the “insured” and “injured” party herein, Ackerman(s)), have legally expressed a “Jury Demand ” for a "trial by jury" in the state trial court.
To this day, the Ackerman's "busies of insurance" case matters remains “incomplete” in the American court(s) of law, and without due process of law to an "inviolate" trial by jury as a basic civil right in action, which is now twenty (20) years past due. Still no jury trial, with a jury of our community peers, to determine all of the genuine legal issues of facts of an insurance policy for a jury to decide in the state regulated “business of insurance”.
Applicable Rules of United States and State of Ohio Constitutional Law Article VI of the United States Constitution;...all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; …. ~and~ * U.S. Constitution; United States Bill of Rights; First Amendment (Redress the Government), Seventh Amendment (Jury in Civil Cases), Tenth Amendment (State Powers), and Fourteenth Amendment (Rights of Citizens). ~and~ * Ohio Constitution; Bill of Rights; Section 1 (Inalienable Rights), Section 5 (Trial by jury), and Section 16 (Redress in Courts) of the Ohio Bill of Rights. *********************************** Currently Docketed Bad Case Law to all American Citizens
The "Original Action" of these legal matters can be found at the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County, Ohio ~ State Jurisdictional Venue (Dayton, Ohio)at Case No. 2000-CV-1472 and Case No. 2003-CV-9499. 1) The Plaintiffs makes state law claims, with an instant action to a “jury demand",
2) Two (2) cases; independent, yet with parallel state law claims. 3) Alleged "False Statements" of the expressed text as the "Employee Retirement Income Security Act", by the legal team of the insurance company
4) Alleged Perjury / Fraud on the court * Case No. 2000-CV-1472 - 2000 ~Case removed; State Constitutional law access, privilege and rights are "denied". * Case No. 2003-CV-9499 - 2003 ~ Case removed; State Constitutional law access, privilege and inviolate rights to a “trial by jury” are "denied". * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Cases are "removed" to the Southwestern District Court of Ohio, ~ Federal Jurisdictional Venue 1) Plaintiffs carry state law claims, with a “Jury Demand". See: FRCP 81(c) 2) Two (2) cases; independent with parallel state law claims are removed via two claims 1) Diversity of citizenship (Legal parties are from different states) 3) Alleged "False Claims" of the "Employee Retirement Income Security Act" against the insured party's state law claims with alleged acts of Perjury / Obstruction of Justice / leading to "fraud on the court". * Case No. 03:00-cv-0277 - 2000 ~ Federal and State Constitutional law access, privilege and inviolate rights to a “trial by jury” are "denied". * Case No. 03:04-cv-0033 - 2004 ~ Federal and State Constitutional law access, privilege and inviolate rights to a “trial by jury” are "denied". * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Currently, these "business of Insurance" cases matters are "terminated" by federal judges and United States Supreme Court Justices.
Next, Plaintiff fined $1000.00 for filing additional papers in support of due process of law with a trial by jury under equal protection of the law.
Next, U.S. Marshal agents sent to the resident of Plaintiff and told to stop filing paper in the Court or risk going to jail.
Note: Never ever give up your valuable legal rights that many have sacrificed their lives for your future benefit.
Thank You for your patriotic support to the State and Federal Constitutions, while preserving the honesty and integrity of the American Judicial Courts.
Notification / Disclosure: All inclusive text herein, and links are for the sole purpose of protecting and preserving the embedded State(s) and Federal Constitutional laws of all American Citizens, while setting exemplary law around the world wherever applicable.