|
Public Safety Notice of Fraud on the Court
Assurant Insurance company, (aka Fortis Benfits Insurance Company / Fortis) and the government of the State of Ohio, along with the Federal Judicial Courts now forces the legal party (Ackerman) to "re-characterize" (change the terms of their established contract), to reflect an ambiguous federal provisional term called "Employee Retirement Income Security Act", "ERISA", and consequently "terminate" the civil and legal right in action to a trial by jury action, upon a timely made "jury demand" made in a court of law.
The Federal provision expressed as the "Employee Retirement Income Security Act"("ERISA") is a perverted Act of Congress that will attempt to change the terms your insurance products and civil rights in the American courts, please carefully read your insurance policies.
We are an "Insured" policyholder and beneficiary of an insurance product (Long Term Disability / LTD policy) that relied on the clear and unambiguous language within our "business of insurance" contract policy, to provide timely benefits in the event of a disability. Upon disability findings, we did not receive financial or rehabilitation benefits for nearly 2 (two) years, and the consequences are against to the policyholder, beneficiary and the general public affairs.
Furthermore, we believe that this "ERISA" provision is forged; fabricated and perpetrated on the court and legal parties. There is simply no evidence within the policy contract, or marketing material, or denial of benefits letters, that ever established that the "Insured" was subject to a federal provisions called the "Employee Retirement Income Security Act", "ERISA". The illegal defense scheme of invoking "ERISA" for the insurance company, is by material fact, completely null and void of any "ERISA"; notifications, disclosures, and language text to a "Statement of ERISA Rights", for the court and jury interpretations in these legal disputes.
There are simply no controlling terms of the "Employee Retirement Income Security Act", "ERISA" for the insurance company defense scheme to invoke a federal claim. Therefore, the insurance company and their legal representatives have allegedly performed perjury in a court of law, with attempted goals to exercise and promote "fraud on the court".
Warning: Fraud on the Court
Assurant (Insurance Company) seeks approval of the court to invoke a federal provision called "Employee Retirement Income Security Act", ("ERISA"), against the insured party and taxpayers, and in consequence the federal trial court (bench judge) will "terminate" the breathing life of the Constitutional of the United States, and the legal right in action to a "trial by jury" upon a timely made "jury demand" in the original complaint and state law claims.
Judicial threat of fraud on the court; Defense legal party is seeking to apply "ERISA" without consent or any valid merit (not the first ink drop of this perpetrated term of "ERISA" in the insurance policy contract), thus misguiding the courts and "terminating" the American citizens of their 'preserved and inviolate' constitutional civil right to a trial by "Jury in Civil Cases", within the Constitution of the United States; Bill of Rights Seventh Amendment, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure; Rule 38 and Rule 81b,c.d.
|